Thank you for posting Marcus,
Marcus, I have come to admire your monotone and tunnel vision responses that tend to drill directly to the heart of the question in hand. I have read quite a bit of your work; even the stuff with that guy who wanted his money back because the questions from the practice exam weren’t on the actual test. That’s crazy hey?! I mean, who would have thought that the PRACTICE questions would not be the exact same questions as the ones on the actual test? This guy was a real piece of work, he blamed CSI for being a corporate money making machine and conspiring to make him fail so they can reap increased profits. Then he went on to assure his loyal audience that he studied the questions his instructor provided and that he had them memorized to the tee. He couldn’t believe he failed the first test, being that he apparently had the test memorized before he wrote it; or so he thought.
After all the dust was settled and the genius had finally settled down, Marcus still dished out monotone non-emotional answers. At this point I was even a little ticked at this. Here I thought: great, another individual in finance who fails to apply the basic concepts of ethics and personal accountability. Then it got me thinking, Marcus you hound you, your a ‘freakin’ robot. That’s right, I know you watch Sarah Connor to. There is no other way to explain it. Nobody could be that level headed and drained of all emotion….it would have to be a robot. Well I found it slightly amusing to visualize the T-1000 sitting hunched over a keyboard answering a response about common shares.
Well Marcus, just wanted to give you a thanks, whoever or whatever you are. You truly did prove that there is no such thing as a stupid question. OK that was a flat out lie, but at least we can pretend…..right?
Steve
Hoped this helped.